During the valve era, many radio manufacturers also made
DC-to-AC inverters to power items such as electric shavers, TV sets and other
240VAC items from 6, 12 or 32V DC. However, with the exception of radiograms,
240VAC radios were rarely powered from inverters, as the inverters were not very
Getting some of those early inverters working again can be
quite a challenge. So let’s take a look at a couple of the more common
Bland’s shaver inverter
Bland Radio Ltd of Adelaide were well-known for their Operatic
series of good performance radios. They also made various other devices, one of
which was an electric shaver inverter. This ran off 6V DC and produced 240V AC
with a near square-wave output waveform. Its current drain was approximately 4A
for a power output of up to 15W.
My unit was obtained when a friend decided to reduce his radio
collection. When I subsequently pulled the cover off the unit to see what was
inside I found an Oak V5211 vibrator, an iron-cored transformer and a 0.5mF 600V
buffer capacitor. These buffer capacitors can be unreliable so I immediately
replaced it with a new polyester type with a slightly higher voltage rating than
the original unit.
There being nothing else to check, I then attached the inverter
to a 6V power supply and absolutely nothing happened. Further examination of the
device then revealed that the inverter had to have a shaver or some other
similar device connected to it to work.
Basically, the earth pin on the appliance’s 240V plug is used
as the switch to turn the device on – see Fig.1. As shown, the earth terminal on
the inverter’s 240V socket was modified so that it had two separate sections.
Plugging in the appliance connected these two sections (via the earth pin on the
plug), thus allowing the inverter to operate from the 6V supply.
In practice, this means that the inverter will not operate
until a 3-pin plug is inserted. It then turns off automatically when you remove
the plug. It’s quite a neat scheme but I wonder how many men complained that the
unit didn’t work, not knowing that their shaver needed to have a 3-pin plug and
not a 2-pin plug!
Having solved that problem, the vibrator started but I still
couldn’t get any voltage out of the unit. An ohmmeter soon showed that the
transformer was still OK so that left the vibrator itself, although it appeared
to be working.
When the vibrator was removed from its case it initially
appeared to be OK. However, the ohmmeter showed that all the contacts except for
the reed drive had oxidised. So although they were making physical contact with
each other, there was no conductivity across the contacts.
This simple 6V DC to 24AC inverter was made by Bland Radio Ltd of Adelaide and was designed to power electric shavers.
This is not a common problem but I’ve seen it before and the
solution is quite simple. It’s just a matter of cleaning the contacts using some
very fine wet and dry paper.
The procedure is as follows. First, tear off a small amount of
wet and dry paper about 20mm square. That done, fold it in half with the
abrasive side out and insert the paper between each set of points. Finally,
press the points lightly together and rub the paper back and forth between the
points until they are clean.
In practice, several pieces of paper are usually needed to get
the points thoroughly clean and conducting again. In this case, once cleaning
had been completed, an output voltage of over 400V peak-to-peak was obtained
with no load. I then put a 5.6kW wirewound resistor across the output and
briefly obtained an output of about 260V before the unit suddenly stopped.
For such a simple device, it was certainly causing more than
its fair share of trouble. I checked the circuit around the vibrator and the
voltages around it were normal. I then re-checked the points and this time found
that the reed drive had fouled up.
As a result, the points were all given a further clean-up,
after which the unit worked well. I then checked the waveform on the
oscilloscope and found what was nominally a square wave but with some slight
resemblance to a sinewave. There was no significant overshoot on the
I don’t have a true RMS meter to measure the output but
according to the oscilloscope, it appeared to be producing roughly 240V AC.
Fig.1: the Bland Radio inverter circuit. Its mains socket used a 2-piece earth terminal which functioned as a switch for the 6V DC input (a scheme that would now be illegal). This meant that the mains plug fitted to the appliance had to have an earth pin in order for the inverter to work.
Having got the unit working, I decided to trace out the circuit
and it turned out to be a little different to most vibrator circuits. In this
unit, the synchronous split-reed V5211 vibrator is wired so that the whole
primary winding is used but the current through the winding is reversed at the
end of each half cycle.
Many vibrator inverters did not work well on inductive loads
and shavers usually are inductive. How-ever, there was no sign of excessive
pitting on the vibrator contacts so it would appear that it did a satisfactory
job, despite the nature of the devices likely to have been connected to it. In
fact, Bland Radio’s vibrator power supplies were well designed and rarely
required vibrator replacement.
Van Ruyten model VR58TV
Up until the late 1950s and even into the 1960s, 240V mains
power was still not available to some farms and other remote areas. Instead,
they mostly relied on 32V DC power plants for lighting but only some household
equipment was designed to operate from this supply voltage.
Items like washing machines, electric irons, food mixers and
vacuum cleaners were available but 32V refrigerators were not (kerosene
refrigerators were used instead). A 32V 2-bar radiator was just not practical
(an open fire or a kerosene heater were used instead) and the pleasure of
watching TV was largely denied to these rural citizens as early TV sets were
only designed for 240V mains operation and used upwards of 200W of power.
There's not much inside the Bland Radio inverter's case - just a standard Oak vibrator unit, a transformer, a capacitor and the mains socket.
Now 200W of power consumption was not in itself too much for a
32V system but the fact that people like to watch TV for many hours per day
meant that the battery bank would have been flattened quite quickly. In
addition, the cost of home generated power was about a dollar per kilowatt hour
or more, which is a lot more than we now pay for electricity. Converting 32V DC
to 240V AC is inherently inefficient and when the efficiency is taken into
account, the total power consumption climbs to nearly 300W.
During that era, the only manufacturer to produce DC-powered TV
sets was Ferris. These purpose-built set incorporated their own vibrator supply
and were more efficient than mains sets operating from an inverter. However,
despite the inefficiency and the cost, there was still some demand for inverters
to run mains-operated TV receivers.
One well-known DC-AC inverter manufacturer was Liebmann Clarke
Pty Ltd of Richmond in Victoria. The company manufactured several different
models, designed to power 240V AC equipment from 6V, 12V or 32V DC.
Their highest power unit was the Van Ruyten model VR58TV. This
32V-to-240V inverter had an output power of 200W and weighed in at 10kg. It was
specifically designed to power black and white TV sets from a 32V bank of
batteries on a farm or station.
This photo shows the Van Ruyten power vibrator (top) alongside a standard Oak vibrator.
In fact, it would appear that the model number indicates the
design year and that its prime purpose was to power TV sets.
When I obtained the inverter, it looked pretty shabby, with
rust showing through the paint work, the voltage adjustment knob missing and the
front panel hanging loose. Unfortunately, I didn’t have any knobs that exactly
matched the type used so I used one that suited the era.
On the other hand, the inside of the inverter was quite clean
and only a quick clean-up with a small paint brush was required. That done, I
separated the unit from its case and removed the front panel. The case and its
panel were then washed with soapy water and left to dry.
Once they had dried, I set about removing the rust and old
paint from these items using an angle grinder. The two parts were then sprayed
with grey hammertone paint and the unit now looks almost like new. It’s
certainly vastly better than the rusty unit it was before restoration.
Overhauling the electronics
It was now time to overhaul the works and my first step was to
replace the 0.56mF 600V paper capacitor (C11) which was leaky as expected. This
was swapped out for two 0.27mF 630V polyester capacitors wired in parallel. All
the other capacitors were being run well under their voltage ratings so I left
them in circuit. That proved to be a mistake but more of that later.
The vibrators in these inverters often had a hard life due to
the uncertainty of whether the load would be inductive or capacitive. C5-C8 and
C11 are the buffer capacitors which "tune" the inductances so that the circuit
resonates to around 50Hz.
However, with capacitive or inductive loads, this tuning will
be altered, leading to sparking at the vibrator points.
This is the above-chassis view of the Van Ruyten VR58TV DC-AC inverter. Note the two large transformers that are used in conjunction with the power vibrator at the rear.
I don’t have any spare 32V vibrators so I dismantled the unit
that was in the inverter. This was done by desoldering the two solder joints
between the base and the can and then sliding the vibrator out.
A close inspection of the points showed that one pair out of
the five sets had a "dag" on one contact which mated with a hole in the other
point. This was fixed by releasing the adjustment screw and filing the dag away.
I then cleaned all the points with fine wet and dry paper.
That done, I re-installed the adjustment screw and rotated it
until I had the same gap as the other parallel set of points. A feeler gauge was
then used to make the adjustment as accurate as possible. I then connected the
vibrator to a 12V supply to check that the reed drive worked properly. This
checked OK and required only a minor adjustment.
The next step was to re-assemble the inverter. First, the 32V
power leads and the grommet were fed through the hole at the bottom of the
panel, then the switch was mounted in position, followed by the 240V output
The 32V switch was next on the list and this proved to be
difficult, as the screws are hard to get at. Eventually, I got them in but then
found that the switch wouldn’t work – much to my frustration.
Fig.2: this is the redrawn circuit for the Van Ruyten 32V DC to 240VAC inverter. The vibrator drives the two sections of the two transformer primary windings in a series push-pull arrangement, while the secondaries are connected in series to drive the output socket.
On inspection, it appeared to be fouling on the switch cut out
on the front panel. Fortunately, the previous owner had left all the screws,
nuts and bolts for the inverter in a plastic bag. Much to my delight, there were
also two ceramic spacers in the bag and it appeared they had been used as
spacers for the switch.
Getting the nut onto the screw nearest the top of the chassis
(furthest into the chassis) was no easy task. Eventually, I resorted to an old
trick. The nut was pressed into the end of a plastic tube, after which I was
eventually able to position it inside the chassis correctly to take the screw.
The one towards the bottom of the chassis is much easier but I now know why the
previous owner passed the unit on to me – he couldn’t get it back together!
The knob I selected for the High/Low switch had a white
recessed indicator line down the pointer section. However, this had largely
disappeared so I scraped out the old paint using a scriber and cleaned it
thoroughly. I then used "White Out" to fill the groove in the knob.
Once this was dry, the excess was scraped off the knob using a
razor blade, leaving a neat white line down the channel in the pointer. It now
looks like new.
It was now only a matter of sliding the chassis back into the
case and fitting four screws. In addition, the rubber feet had long since
disappeared from the bottom of the case so I used four large rubber stick-on
furniture-type buffers to stand the case proud of the bench. These can be
obtained from hardware or "$2" shops. The finished unit now looks quite
attractive, especially when compared to the grubby unit it was before
Now it was time to test the unit. I slipped it out of the case,
connected my 32V DC power supply to it and connected a 15W 240V lamp to the
output as a load. This load was deliberately kept small as my 32V supply is only
rated at 1.5A.
At this stage, I still had the cover off the vibrator. I turned
the power on and the unit started up and produced an output. Everything appeared
to be OK, so I left it running on soak test.
Unfortunately, it didn’t stay that way for long – the next time
I came back, there were tiny bits of silver paper and other tiny bits of powdery
material like confetti near the inverter. The inverter was still running quite
happily so I turned it off to investigate. When I looked under the chassis, I
was greeted by two capacitors that had blown their insides out.
This under-chassis view of the Van Ruyten inverter shows it to be a more complicated beast than the low-power Bland Radio unit. The red arrow points to the four new polyester capacitors that were fitted.
The two capacitors involved were among the primary circuit
buffers (C5-C8). They had overheated so badly that foil had been blown out of
them. The inverter had kept going despite this catastrophic failure and none of
the foil shorted anything out.
It was easily fixed – the "confetti" was cleaned out and the
four capacitors (which were still quite hot) removed from the chassis. These
original paper capacitors were then replaced with a batch of four polyester type
As shown in one of the photos, the replacement capacitors were
glued together with contact adhesive and then tied to the tag strip on the
bottom of one of the transformers using a plastic cable tie.
Why did they fail?
The original paper capacitors are rated at 300V working, so why
did they "blow up" when only 32V was being applied across them?
The answer is that the actual voltage across them is in fact
considerably higher than the supply voltage, as the circuit is roughly resonant
at 50Hz. As a result, considerable voltage is developed across the total
inductance of the primary windings as they are completely charged and discharged
100 times a second.
This is the Van Ruyten inverter's case before restoration. The rust was removed using a drill fitted with a wire brush, after which the unit was repainted so that it now looks almost like new.
I hadn’t checked for leakage across these capacitors as I had
reasoned (erroneously) that even if they did have some leakage, it would not be
serious enough to cause much heating. How wrong I was. The two that hadn’t blown
up showed very low insulation resistance, so how low was the resistance in the
two that did blew up?
In hindsight, I should have tested these capacitors for leakage
resistance before starting the unit up and then I should have periodically
(every few minutes) checked for any signs of overheating.
These vibrator-powered DC-to-AC inverters served the needs of
the public quite well before the arrival of solid-state devices. A number of
other brands were also produced although they were not as common as the Van
Van Ruyten also produced a 100W version of the unit described
above and it used just one transformer. The radio frequency (RF) filtering in
the Van Ruyten unit may be sufficient so as not to noticeably impair domestic
radio reception but the Bland Radio unit has no such RF filtering. As a result,
the reception on any radio used with the Bland Radio unit would have been
severely marred by interference due to sparking at the vibrator points.
Based on my experience, these vibrator-type inverters were only
moderately reliable due to the uncertain characteristics of the loads that they
drove. By contrast, the Davey rotary motor alternator was a very reliable device
which produced sinewave 240V AC, compared to the roughly square-wave output from
the vibrator inverters. They also were not affected to any extent by the type of
load that was connected to them.
However, the Davey units were rare-
ly seen as they were even more
expensive than the vibrator inverters and drew even more current from the 32V DC
Photo Gallery: Astor Mickey Model DL
Manufactured by Radio Corporation, Melbourne in 1947, the "DL" was another model carrying the "Mickey" name. It was fitted with a full-width (almost) glass dial, with the loudspeaker mounted at the side of the cabinet. This set did not employ the reflex circuit that was later to become popular with "Mickey" models until the end of the series. Brown and cream were probably the most common cabinet colours and this mottled yellow example is unusual.
The valve line-up was as follows: 6A8-G frequency changer, 6B8-G reflexed IF amplifier/1st audio amplifier/detector/AVC rectifier, 6V6-GT audio output and 5Y3-GT rectifier. Photo: Historical Radio Society of Australia, Inc.